Pulpit Magazine has posted the response from John MacArthur to a question about the infamous age of accountability. I encourage you to go read it and then let me know what you think. I have posted a couple of comments to the article, but as of this writing they have not been approved, so I will repost them here for you to see.
Comment #1 -
I have been looking all morning for any passages in the OT that refer to children as innocent…and I can’t find any. I too would appreciate some Scriptural references for this assertion.
The other thing that makes little sense to me is how one could say a child is fallen and sinful, yet at the same time say that God treats them as innocent in spite of that if they have not yet reached this “age of accountability”.
We are either born guilty and sinful, or we are not. Which is it?
Comment #2 -
Secondly, to use the same consistent line of thought regarding the use of the description “innocent” for children (I hope we see some examples of this)…adults in the OT are described with that term quite a bit. Does that mean they too are guiltless before God? If not, why not?
Thanks.
Comment #3 -
I found two references to the “innocents”…
Jer. 2:34 and 19:4…
neither of which lend any real support to an age of accountability and children being guiltless before God.
The most interesting comment to me by MacArthur in the whole article is when he says the following:
so I believe that God, prior to the “age of accountability” treats them [children] as “innocent.” It doesn’t mean that they are not fallen; it doesn’t mean that they are not sinful — it does mean that God mercifully treats them as “innocent” in spite of that, and He has to exercise grace to do that, just as He exercises grace to save those who believe.
You heard it straight from Johnny Mac’s own words. Two ways of salvation. ONE – faith. TWO – death prior to reaching the age of accountability. Unless I am missing something, is he not implying here that God saves children who have not reached this age by a means other than repentance and faith and trust in the person and work of Christ? Yes, he says their salvation is the result of God’s exercising of grace. But, he seems to differentiate that work of grace from the work of grace which saves those who believe.
For those Mac-idolaters out there, know that I love and respect him greatly. But I strongly disagree with his position on the state of children and their position before God prior to reaching some age where they know right from wrong. If it pleases God to save children who die, He does it in the same way He saves anyone else…by grace, through faith. Are we really willing to set up alternative scenarios for salvation just to comfort someone who has lost a child?
Any thoughts?


Subscribe
Your King Has Come - Indelible Grace



family for the purpose of family worship that we soon notice that we have gone several days, or a couple of weeks, and have failed to keep up our plans on a regular basis. That’s usually when the guilt sets in and we resolve anew to maintain a consistent routine with respect to having a specific time set aside for some type of devotion or discussion about all things pertaining to God. There is certainly nothing wrong with having consistent family devotions or family worship. But, I am here to tell you right now that I do not believe there is anything wrong either with having an inconsistent (or even non-existent) record of maintaining special times set aside for family devotions or family worship. You read me correctly, and I’ll type it again. There is nothing wrong or sinful about a family not having special time set aside for family worship.